ProstaVive
Prostate-support product guide
View Product
What qualifies for the Mass Gainers directory?
This page is for current calorie-dense products explicitly designed and positioned as weight-gain or mass-gain formulas. The primary user task is comparing how much energy, protein and carbohydrate a full serving delivers, not comparing casein type or meal-completeness.
The current verified set includes Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass, Dymatize Super Mass Gainer, MuscleTech Mass-Tech, Naked Mass, Transparent Labs Mass Gainer and BSN TRUE-MASS 1200.
Calories per full serving are the defining field
Serious Mass currently lists roughly 1,250–1,260 calories per serving depending on flavor. Dymatize Super Mass Gainer lists up to 1,310 calories. MuscleTech Mass-Tech lists 1,370 calories. Naked Mass lists 1,250 calories. Transparent Labs is materially lower at roughly 760–770 calories per serving.
This creates the first mass-gainer-specific information-gain layer: current products span materially different calorie densities even though they share the same broad category label.
Protein and carbohydrate should be shown beside calories
Serious Mass currently lists 50 g protein and 250–253 g carbohydrates. Dymatize lists 52 g protein and up to 252 g carbohydrates. Mass-Tech lists 50 g protein and 280 g carbohydrates. Naked Mass lists 50 g protein and 252 g carbohydrates. BSN TRUE-MASS 1200 lists 50 g protein and 213–215 g carbohydrates.
MenPS should keep protein and carbohydrate separate from total calories so users can distinguish calorie density from macro architecture.
Full-serving size and scoop burden deserve their own field
Mass gainers can require very large full servings. A calorie figure is therefore incomplete without the corresponding serving definition. MenPS should record the full serving size and, where current labels make it clear, scoop burden or grams per serving.
This makes the comparison practical and prevents smaller half-servings from being compared against another product's full label serving.
Creatine, fats and fiber can materially change formula architecture
Serious Mass currently lists 5 g creatine monohydrate per serving. MuscleTech Mass-Tech also lists 5 g creatine. Transparent Labs currently lists 3 g creatine monohydrate, 15 g fat and 6 g prebiotic fiber alongside its macro profile.
These are secondary architecture fields and should be visible without turning the page into a creatine or fiber directory.
Naked Mass is a useful simple-formula comparator
Naked Mass currently combines whey, casein and organic maltodextrin. That makes it useful for users who want to compare a relatively simple mass-gain architecture against products with longer ingredient systems.
Formula simplicity is therefore a separate field from calorie density and should not be equated with better efficacy.
Availability needs to be tracked separately
MuscleTech Mass-Tech remains a current product but the inspected official page shows out of stock. Current identity and purchase availability should remain separate, as with other MenPS categories.
Recommended Mass-Gainer data model
The core fields should be calories per full serving, protein, carbohydrates, fat, serving size, scoop burden, creatine inclusion, fiber where disclosed, formula complexity, current availability and source-check date.
Flavor-dependent ranges should be preserved as ranges rather than converted into one universal value.
How this differs from Casein and Meal Replacements
Mass gainers are defined by calorie-dense weight-gain architecture. Casein products are primarily protein products. Meal replacements are built around replacing a meal with broader nutrition coverage. A high-protein powder is not automatically a mass gainer, and a calorie-dense mass gainer is not automatically a balanced meal replacement.
More calories do not automatically mean a better product
Manufacturer pages can verify calories, macros, creatine, ingredients and availability. They do not independently establish that the highest-calorie product produces the best muscle or weight-gain outcome for every user.
Current-source verification
All six current mass-gainer rows were freshly checked against official manufacturer sources during the September audit. Out-of-stock status and flavor-specific macro ranges should be rechecked at later material updates.
Useful follow-up questions
Is the highest-calorie mass gainer automatically best?
No. Calories are one catalog field and should be considered with serving burden, protein, carbohydrate and formula architecture.
Why compare creatine separately?
Because some current mass gainers include it and others do not, which changes the formula even when calorie totals are similar.
Is a mass gainer the same as a meal replacement?
No. Mass gainers are calorie-dense weight-gain products, while meal replacements are intended to replace a meal with broader nutrition coverage.
Primary product sources used for this snapshot
Current product identity, nutrition/composition, availability and format were checked against manufacturer or brand-owned product pages. These sources support catalog facts, not independent efficacy conclusions.